From owner-freebsd-current  Mon May 27 23:10:23 1996
Return-Path: owner-current
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id XAA04096
          for current-outgoing; Mon, 27 May 1996 23:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA04090
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 27 May 1996 23:10:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id XAA00843; Mon, 27 May 1996 23:09:55 -0700 (PDT)
To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@Glue.umd.edu>
cc: Veggy Vinny <richardc@CSUA.Berkeley.EDU>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Dual P5-100 support 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 27 May 1996 21:56:49 EDT."
             <Pine.OSF.3.91.960527215359.10625D-100000@skipper.eng.umd.edu> 
Date: Mon, 27 May 1996 23:09:55 -0700
Message-ID: <841.833263795@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> That's not too fair, Jordan.  Example: FreeBSD native ELF support was 
> available first under stable (that's where John Polstra was doing his 
> work) before it was brought into current.

Perhaps unofficially, but in the actual -stable and -current trees?
Check again, please.

> Personally, I'm not happy that we have 2 separate branches that are the 
> subject of original development, but I don't work at such levels, so I 

They're not.  Original development goes into -current.

					Jordan