From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 15 16:51:38 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0541316A400 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:51:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from mesiob.obspm.fr (mesiob.obspm.fr [145.238.2.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 842F213C45E for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:51:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from localhost (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.2.126]) by mesiob.obspm.fr (8.13.4/8.13.4/SIO Observatoire de Paris) with ESMTP id l5FGpUYT008106 for ; Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:51:30 +0200 Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:51:31 +0200 From: Albert Shih To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20070615165131.GC51206@pcjas.obspm.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (mesiob.obspm.fr [145.238.2.2]); Fri, 15 Jun 2007 18:51:31 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.90.3, clamav-milter version 0.90.3 on mesiob.obspm.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: UFS(2, 3 ?) vs ZFS. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Albert.Shih@obspm.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2007 16:51:38 -0000 Hi all Anyone known what's the futur of ufs2 ? Is there any plan to make a ufs3 for very large FS (> 2TB) . Or the plan is to use classic ufs for / & /usr and lets use ZFS for /home Regards. -- Albert SHIH Observatoire de Paris Meudon SIO batiment 15 Heure local/Local time: Ven 15 jui 2007 18:49:50 CEST