From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Mar 18 09:00:58 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id JAA06059 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 18 Mar 1996 09:00:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from cabal.io.org (cabal.io.org [198.133.36.103]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA06053 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 1996 09:00:55 -0800 (PST) Received: (from taob@localhost) by cabal.io.org (8.7.4/8.7.4) id LAA01427; Mon, 18 Mar 1996 11:58:25 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 1996 11:58:21 -0500 (EST) From: Brian Tao To: Joe Greco cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Microsoft "Get ISDN"? In-Reply-To: <199603181619.KAA25833@brasil.moneng.mei.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Mon, 18 Mar 1996, Joe Greco wrote: > > consumer. I agree with you, an ISP who sticks a bunch of high-speed > > serial ports connected to a bunch of Bitsurfrs to provide ISDN access > > is just asking for trouble. > > Why is that? People keep telling me how the Portmasters can handle 115200 > on all ports simultaneously... what's the difference between this and > hooking up a bunch of 28.8's? Actually, I was referring specifically to the situation with ISDN. Instead of having a pile of serial controllers, a pile of Bitsurfrs, a pile of power bars, a pile of serial cables and a pile of phone cables, get yourself a Portmaster with BRI cards or if you're a larger operation, something like an Ascend MAX series and run BRI's and PRI's right into the box. Looking at our machine room, the most problematic area is the nest of cabling and wires between the modems, the Portmasters and the bix blocks. I'd love to be able to plug a single cable into a PRI port and be able to run 23 B channels from there. No fuss no muss. > > However, for a workstation or PC at home, > > a serially-connected ISDN TA will work just fine. Heck, I can even > > connect a 28.8k modem to the POTS jack on my Bitsurfr as a dialin port > > and keep my analog voice line free. > > Yes, that is quite attractive :-) I forgot... I also have a regular analog phone connected to the modem, which serves as a second voice line. :) For the price, a Bitsurfr is flexible and ideal for casual home use. -- Brian Tao (BT300, taob@io.org) Systems Administrator, Internex Online Inc. "Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"