From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 2 12:30:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE815FA for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 12:30:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F31EBE for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 12:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r12CU174066175 for ; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 12:30:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r12CU1Bj066171; Sat, 2 Feb 2013 12:30:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 12:30:01 GMT Message-Id: <201302021230.r12CU1Bj066171@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Niclas Zeising Subject: Re: ports/175532: x11/xdm: /bin/cp -n /usr/local/share/examples/xdm/GiveConsole /usr/local/lib/X11/xdm/GiveConsole *** [post-install] Error code 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Niclas Zeising List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 12:30:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/175532; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Niclas Zeising To: "O. Hartmann" Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/175532: x11/xdm: /bin/cp -n /usr/local/share/examples/xdm/GiveConsole /usr/local/lib/X11/xdm/GiveConsole *** [post-install] Error code 1 Date: Sat, 02 Feb 2013 13:16:17 +0100 On 02/02/13 13:04, O. Hartmann wrote: > Am 02/02/13 11:21, schrieb Niclas Zeising: >> On 02/02/13 11:15, O. Hartmann wrote: >>> Am 02/02/13 10:34, schrieb Niclas Zeising: >>>> Hi! >>>> Apparently something in the base system has changed, which affects >>>> rebuild of this port when it is already installed. Since this change to >>>> the base system isn't very old, and most ports testing are done on clean >>>> systems, using tinderbox or poudriere or similar software, this has gone >>>> through the cracks. For now, I suggest you remove xdm before >>>> reinstalling it, since all files should be removed in the >>>> deinstallation. If xdm leaves files behind, then that is a separate >>>> issue. however that would show up on a tinderbox run, and I can build >>>> xdm fine in my tinderbox. >>>> Regards! >>>> >>> >>> Have you used NEW_XORG=YES in make.conf? I use those bits to build the >>> most recent stuff and I realized this causes problems since several >>> changes a couple of days ago. >>> >>> Oliver >>> >> >> Yes. What other problems are you referring to? x11/xdm is the same >> version regardless of WITH_NEW_XORG. >> Regards! >> > > Those problems are related to other ports, databases/akonadi or > deskutils/kdepimlibs4 which refuse to compile not finding qmake (which > is installed as qmake-qt4). > > From time to time I realized running CURRENT, it is wise to recompile > ports. So I did with xorg and xdm since they had been compiled in the > CLANG 3.1 era and now we are with CLANG 3.2 and with libc++. > > When I performed a "portmaster -w -r xorg xdm", I found myself lost with > the reported error and with a deleted pkg database entry for xdm. > x11/xdm wasn't even reported installed then - but the binaries of the > new build were obviously there. > > It is not the first time that portmaster deletes a port and at the very > end it fails and refuses updating the database, like it happened with > x11/xdm. Without knowing any details, that sounds partly like a problem with portmaster... As I said, I can't reproduce the xdm issue locally, although I do not use portmaster, and most of my builds are done with a tinderbox of some sort. Regards! -- Niclas Zeising