From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 17 08:13:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79CC116A403 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 08:13:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alen@smartnet.ba) Received: from mta-gw1.europronet.ba (gamera.europronet.ba [80.65.162.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0809043D46 for ; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 08:13:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alen@smartnet.ba) Received: from localhost (localhost.europronet.ba [127.0.0.1]) by mta-gw1.europronet.ba (Postfix) with ESMTP id B829D17096; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 10:13:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from alens (internal.europronet.ba [80.65.162.66]) by mta-gw1.europronet.ba (Postfix) with SMTP id 687D6170C4; Mon, 17 Apr 2006 10:13:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <001301c661f7$83385000$0407a8c0@alens> From: "Alen Sarkinovic" To: "ovidiu" References: <20060415175946.54C1D43D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org> <044a01c660c1$4ad6bee0$0407a8c0@alens> <44418CAF.7050308@unixware.ro> Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 10:18:29 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1807 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1807 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at europronet.ba Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PPPoE X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 08:13:16 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "ovidiu" To: "Alen Sarkinovic" Sent: Sunday, April 16, 2006 2:15 AM Subject: Re: PPPoE > Alen Sarkinovic wrote: > > >I'm running FreeBSD 5.4 on HP DL380 2xXeon 3.2GHz with 2GB DDR2 with 600 > >users simultaneous connections and traffic in/out about 20Mb on Ethernet GB > >card. > > > >Load averages: 4.54 max in peak time. > > > >Regarding my privies experience with slower machine system can handle all > >request without any problems with > >max load avr: 12.00 > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Farhad" > >To: > >Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2006 7:59 PM > >Subject: PPPoE > > > > > > > > > >>How many simulative session can support PPPoE server. > >> > >>_______________________________________________ > >>freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > >> > >> > > > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > Hello > > I have few questions: > > I am using mpd pppoe server with 400 simultaneous connections, on a P IV > at 3 Ghz, 1 GB ram, I have 20% cpu usage on peak. > > I've purchased a Xeon server (with one CPU, but the motherboard is dual > Xeon) at 3 Ghz with 4 GB RAM. > > My question should I purchase another CPU to use dual function (SMP)? It > will help me with mpd? Yes it will help! > Another question: what ISO you use: freebsd 5.4 i386 or amd64 ? > I'm using i386 ! > (The amd64 is on 64 bits, that should help to increase the speed of > FreeBSD server, but I was not able to use amd64 iso because it stop > booting when detecting the onboard RAID controller.) You can check this and eventualy report to http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64.html > And last question: what traffic shaping you use? I use pf with HFSC > algorithm wich works fine for hundreads of queues but is not good for > thousands, because is a linear algorithm. > > If you do not use pf HFSC, but pf with CBQ or PRIQ or ipfw with > dummynet, please tell me how do you succeed to have QoS. For example I > need to have different pppoe connections with different speeds, > guarantee bandwidth. > I am looking for a long time for proper setting, i think Linux's HTB is > better but I want to use FreeBSD. I'm using pppoed on cable network and traffic shaping & QoS was a part of Dosis standard. But IPFW is great solution, you can check WARTA on http://www.hpi.net/whitepapers/warta/ > Thank You > Best Regards, > Ovidiu > >