From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Feb 11 21:59:30 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.HiWAAY.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56])
	by builder.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 615303F61; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 21:59:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (sprice@localhost)
	by mail.HiWAAY.net (8.9.3/8.9.0) with ESMTP id XAA17089;
	Fri, 11 Feb 2000 23:54:46 -0600 (CST)
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2000 23:54:46 -0600 (CST)
From: Steve Price <sprice@hiwaay.net>
To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami <asami@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>, ports@FreeBSD.ORG,
	shige@FreeBSD.ORG, torstenb@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: zsh re-org.
In-Reply-To: <vqcbt5nxdqz.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.21.0002112353220.27636-100000@fly.HiWAAY.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On 11 Feb 2000, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote:

#  * From: Bill Fumerola <billf@chc-chimes.com>
# 
#  * I believe that the way that zsh is being handled should be flipped around.
#  * 
#  * ports/shells/zsh should be 3.1.6
#  * ports/shells/zsh-devel should be retired (after making shells/zsh 3.1.6)
#  * 
#  * I don't believe we need a 3.0.7 version of zsh in the tree at all.
#  * 
#  * Comments?
# 
# Fine by me.  (But then, I don't use zsh. :)

I use zsh all the time now and I say go for it! :)

-suteebu



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message