From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 10 16:03:02 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E30215 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 16:03:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-f54.google.com (mail-pa0-f54.google.com [209.85.220.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D5B8FC08 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 16:03:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id bi1so3623183pad.13 for ; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:03:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=DSqF54x19X7VJdvHm4YkADnzzLZA++LQ51W/QSNtr8o=; b=gLKK3xLQ4Aq6sqhtHQPY7+CEAZjyhj7yriCd32Naq1fuxS/yA84zQlFO3wgqggvbup GMynJ8oX01HKY6PwCP/MmjlBVASMi0Ca9mwNfP/3tSSFvBt9wmvr/EMfimyf5AUeskyQ EoVGC6cshMmr0wLJilsd9cqnhelQCO02rPWCkw7vWMnkrM5jL0FD6h4HVwlIwraziiGN HtEbLbkRvWltImriBaw8QsZn/vr7UoHAxC7+5830JYuZ7pw4WPhgNsX1hh+tq3Fcr+Sq SJieyb1TBbUHBWeUr4tuFVhpeLnJLU2xgYZhYUDcHRfBZex1aIeKhXehmfd7RDbpi2J5 X5zg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.209.166 with SMTP id mn6mr15532677pbc.95.1352563380687; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:03:00 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.68.124.130 with HTTP; Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:03:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 08:03:00 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: GghAOzdQQenVjfOqMlsYc_opIIg Message-ID: Subject: Re: [head tinderbox] failure on arm/arm From: Adrian Chadd To: Doug Brewer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Chuck Burns X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 16:03:02 -0000 On 10 November 2012 07:10, Doug Brewer wrote: > Adrian Chadd wrote: > On 9 November 2012 14:37, Chuck Burns wrote: >> >> > Adrian. diskspace and cpu cycles are things I can spare, drop me a line >> > outside of the ML and we can discuss particulars. "It's just a personal >> > box.. on a residential internet service, I have an amd64 box with 600G free >> > on my pool.. 8G ram.. and I have a smaller i386 box... 100G or so free, 512M >> > ram.. just drop me a line.. >> >> Hi, >> >> Those I do have - I have access to all of the ref* boxes in the >> cluster. I'm just typically hacking on this stuff on the train or at a >> cafe, and I don't have a workflow setup for pushing out potential >> diffs to build machines that have all the grunt/disk space for each >> little change that I do. > > Wait wait wait. It makes me wonder if you get the patch tested well > on the train or at a cafe before being committed. I tend to have a _lot_ of FreeBSD devices on me. People who have seen me hack can attest to this. >> I'm sorry about breaking things from time to time, but besides a small >> handful of "what was I thinking?!" things, the build breaks are just >> that - build breaks. They're easily fixed. > > I do not care how things are easily fixed. Remember, when Sam Leffler > was the maintainer of ath and CAMBRIA board (it's an embedded device, right?), > he had never broke the build. He's better than I? :) adrian