From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Oct  2 12:29:26 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA17210
          for stable-outgoing; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 12:29:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ptway.com (apollo.ptway.com [199.176.148.3])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA17198
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 12:29:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from brianjr.haskin.org (123R1.ptway.com [199.176.148.66]) by ptway.com (8.7.1/3.4W4-PTWAY-sco-ODT3.0) with ESMTP id PAA09433; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 15:21:19 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <3433F5B8.B1179585@ptway.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 15:27:52 -0400
From: Brian Haskin <haskin@ptway.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.01 [en] (Win95; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
CC: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: CVSUP vs. SNAPS
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
References: <11918.875811660@time.cdrom.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> 
> > Please, not again, don't duplicate the errors of your past handling
> > of this.
> >
> > The sequence of commits should be something that creates
> >
> > 2.2-STABLE (where we are today)
> > 2.2.5-BETA (for while we are in BETA on the branch)
> > 2.2.5-RELEASE (when you finally roll the puppy up)
> > 2.2.5-STABLE (after you roll the release).
> 
> That would be totally and utterly bogus.
> 
>                                         Jordan

Why this seems rather logical and easy to follow at least to me a
newbie.

Brian Haskin <haskin@ptway.com>