From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Wed Nov 20 18:02:28 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B501BE436; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 18:02:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antoine.brodin.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qv1-f68.google.com (mail-qv1-f68.google.com [209.85.219.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47J9Wl0lg5z49VT; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 18:02:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antoine.brodin.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qv1-f68.google.com with SMTP id w11so250298qvu.13; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 10:02:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dAGTgnsB6/AV+YvzZgn96c7as37gL0/Yf/aPnbr3HHY=; b=K9kol2S53HSDPKUmRWzQurqJjCUExDjy+KWREuCNnbc5koT2Rl1HxkDuUNSr4bhLqy 27kQTgRP2SplyXOzEqd45L307Ju/xAjBy0Ivokqok2q+XeLNZC5IRboaybP26BTZUsSr naXQR1y3YTANhVViWpBbXlEjsXc2+rtsj3Xz4v/Xby2FWfdMEEA5H7TlvDJBucUm+SX4 VYr7A3teJLKCuvvUKB9x2H66vrE7EdnGtAqdEsWIslEVbbrpPot9kbI5q/xKnNwpuEhF rjDfPQJOHuXkbfJBxLYV68WS89JbnUlt7pJurTOhTOt6ugMI3fpZ0QfgYI229e0dIjqu vjeQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVhExsISZzh3ImZkZJJjXcqynaZGjBVFOVYWDjnvOm0ffvCwHMV DuY6YsHxowyJF7SjRQRZIsVpVy4XkaK8TMNVHOv6Dw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxFPZdk3tkELfmPFBxRhThKQ2tim2oc0oXKnYZ6vsDywUagyWiuVga5DNTJ7exfv+A55rf+aL9wYfKNHwwydC0= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:f987:: with SMTP id t7mr575331qvn.133.1574272945669; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 10:02:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201911201440.xAKEeWZ7011143@repo.freebsd.org> <20191120172307.GA24348@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <20191120172307.GA24348@hades.panopticon> From: Antoine Brodin Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 19:02:14 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r518022 - head/devel/py-llfuse To: Dmitry Marakasov Cc: ports-committers , svn-ports-all , svn-ports-head Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47J9Wl0lg5z49VT X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of antoinebrodinfreebsd@gmail.com designates 209.85.219.68 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=antoinebrodinfreebsd@gmail.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.04 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[antoine@freebsd.org,antoinebrodinfreebsd@gmail.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[4]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[68.219.85.209.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.0]; IP_SCORE(-1.04)[ipnet: 209.85.128.0/17(-3.18), asn: 15169(-1.97), country: US(-0.05)]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[antoine@freebsd.org,antoinebrodinfreebsd@gmail.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[68.219.85.209.rep.mailspike.net : 127.0.0.17]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 18:02:28 -0000 On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 6:33 PM Dmitry Marakasov wrote: > > * Antoine Brodin (antoine@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > > > Author: antoine > > Date: Wed Nov 20 14:40:31 2019 > > New Revision: 518022 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/518022 > > > > Log: > > Revert r517286, breaking bulk -a is not covered by portmgr blanket > > How exactly and why does specifying the correct python version > limitation not affecting default python versions, break bulk, and how > should this be handled? This breaks bulk -a with default version of python equal to 3.7 or 3.8 because of net/s3ql. In my opinion the correct way to handle ports that work fine with python 3.6 but not 3.7 or 3.8 is to mark them BROKEN for these cases. They may (should?) be fixed upstream or with patches. Antoine