Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:23:02 +0200
From:      Levent Serinol <lserinol@gmail.com>
To:        Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ZFS spa_sync() spends 10-20% of its time in spa_free_sync_cb()
Message-ID:  <CACqg54RN_eDkQ0bATaWqNEb%2BG%2BeYGTDzZkYK9YiBdZuuD=54iA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20121120091600.GA4535@server.rulingia.com>
References:  <CACqg54SHFT_apscU3h9tw=x3=X5d68RHw35GjXLvVwjw_WnjMQ@mail.gmail.com> <20121120091600.GA4535@server.rulingia.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ok that good news for me. I can test it with cvs head to see results on
heavily loaded server. Looks like I was hitting this bug on production
servers.

Thanks,



On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com> wrote:

> On 2012-Nov-20 10:19:34 +0200, Levent Serinol <lserinol@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I was following illumos cvs for a while and noticed a bug #3329 yesterday
> >that fixed in cvs. It looks like Freebsd cvs/web  is down so I couldn't be
> >sure if it's also fixed in freebsd head cvs. Can anyone know  if this one
> >fixed in freebsd zfs code or scheduled to do  ?
>
> See http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/242735
>
> I'm not sure what the plans are for merging the fixes back to -stable.
>
> --
> Peter Jeremy
>



-- 

http://lserinol.blogspot.com/



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACqg54RN_eDkQ0bATaWqNEb%2BG%2BeYGTDzZkYK9YiBdZuuD=54iA>