Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:23:02 +0200 From: Levent Serinol <lserinol@gmail.com> To: Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ZFS spa_sync() spends 10-20% of its time in spa_free_sync_cb() Message-ID: <CACqg54RN_eDkQ0bATaWqNEb%2BG%2BeYGTDzZkYK9YiBdZuuD=54iA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20121120091600.GA4535@server.rulingia.com> References: <CACqg54SHFT_apscU3h9tw=x3=X5d68RHw35GjXLvVwjw_WnjMQ@mail.gmail.com> <20121120091600.GA4535@server.rulingia.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ok that good news for me. I can test it with cvs head to see results on heavily loaded server. Looks like I was hitting this bug on production servers. Thanks, On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com> wrote: > On 2012-Nov-20 10:19:34 +0200, Levent Serinol <lserinol@gmail.com> wrote: > > I was following illumos cvs for a while and noticed a bug #3329 yesterday > >that fixed in cvs. It looks like Freebsd cvs/web is down so I couldn't be > >sure if it's also fixed in freebsd head cvs. Can anyone know if this one > >fixed in freebsd zfs code or scheduled to do ? > > See http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/242735 > > I'm not sure what the plans are for merging the fixes back to -stable. > > -- > Peter Jeremy > -- http://lserinol.blogspot.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CACqg54RN_eDkQ0bATaWqNEb%2BG%2BeYGTDzZkYK9YiBdZuuD=54iA>