From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 20 09:23:04 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58D2CFEB for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:23:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lserinol@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F4E8FC16 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:23:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f54.google.com with SMTP id je9so1632161bkc.13 for ; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 01:23:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=fhzkigQaGxFeM/kPRoW+XuwoEv0+zMQg5ehSf/Og0Ts=; b=DLDGjjP+SSwzis80U7+PbT2hc6kk8h2GcDGz+FJ+CXr543IBhDRDuuGMPZ1A6BLsPO R7reLUNxlUxxLvtfJ1vTwn2C+aRYJPT/Lov/V4/25Pz86/QRSKTuClT7xAn6naIgTehK iAsGzHk9iEN+zrzev2xDR3YxKf4igbueCGY+dCDBpe7KUhLIBKPLyFdRJVG6u76Pla4B 9ppR8PCnMpYTfljwnukY/mFq8IchqJpVEHCF+/m0+MTvxrukHFwiDCyyZXDRbvFKl5kh 84u6RrU57BHyfrXJFx+gzDqUKQKZknk21XA8g5I1ytJ/6BzGrAyH6BFfKRyRdsIuMax8 SfzA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.148.195 with SMTP id q3mr1716599bkv.122.1353403382458; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 01:23:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.205.113.203 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Nov 2012 01:23:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20121120091600.GA4535@server.rulingia.com> References: <20121120091600.GA4535@server.rulingia.com> Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 11:23:02 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ZFS spa_sync() spends 10-20% of its time in spa_free_sync_cb() From: Levent Serinol To: Peter Jeremy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 09:23:04 -0000 Ok that good news for me. I can test it with cvs head to see results on heavily loaded server. Looks like I was hitting this bug on production servers. Thanks, On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Peter Jeremy wrote: > On 2012-Nov-20 10:19:34 +0200, Levent Serinol wrote: > > I was following illumos cvs for a while and noticed a bug #3329 yesterday > >that fixed in cvs. It looks like Freebsd cvs/web is down so I couldn't be > >sure if it's also fixed in freebsd head cvs. Can anyone know if this one > >fixed in freebsd zfs code or scheduled to do ? > > See http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/242735 > > I'm not sure what the plans are for merging the fixes back to -stable. > > -- > Peter Jeremy > -- http://lserinol.blogspot.com/