From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 3 08:26:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53EFB16A4D1 for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 08:26:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from relay01.pair.com (relay01.pair.com [209.68.5.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0702643D5F for ; Thu, 3 Mar 2005 08:26:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: (qmail 39489 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2005 08:26:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 3 Mar 2005 08:26:26 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 209.68.2.70 Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2005 02:26:25 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Silbersack To: David Schultz In-Reply-To: <20050303064206.GA14434@VARK.MIT.EDU> Message-ID: <20050303010246.H811@odysseus.silby.com> References: <200503021343.j22DhpQ3075008@repoman.freebsd.org> <200503020915.28512.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <4226446B.7020406@freebsd.org> <20050303033115.GA13174@VARK.MIT.EDU> <42269DB0.6070107@freebsd.org> <20050303052902.GA14011@VARK.MIT.EDU> <4226A46B.2090704@freebsd.org> <20050303001403.W811@odysseus.silby.com> <20050303064206.GA14434@VARK.MIT.EDU> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG cc: David Xu cc: John Baldwin cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_sig.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 08:26:29 -0000 On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, David Schultz wrote: > Another thing that swapping does, though, is prevent some > processes from running for a while when the system is under load, > thereby reducing contention for resources and allowing the other > processes to get things done. If people decide to go this way, it > might be a good idea to keep the second feature. It costs very > little in terms of complexity because no actual swapping is done. > But who knows? Maybe nobody cares about this, either... That'd probably help a lot more than our current system of hoping that the swapping rate limits things does. I bet David could code it up in a matter of minutes. :) Mike "Silby" Silbersack