From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 7 20:16:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1C391065673 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2008 20:16:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A878FC19 for ; Sun, 7 Dec 2008 20:16:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 07 Dec 2008 15:16:41 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.8.6-GA) with ESMTP id PHM09940; Sun, 7 Dec 2008 15:16:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from unknown (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.22.188]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 07 Dec 2008 15:16:41 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <18748.12071.922727.56603@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2008 15:16:39 -0500 To: "Paul B. Mahol" In-Reply-To: <3a142e750812071056l50e8f464oa5169b9f3d107902@mail.gmail.com> References: <4be2da2e0812062344y26eddcc9sf589531d10c71a1c@mail.gmail.com> <11167f520812070853i3b6fa6dei6e5c71669416470@mail.gmail.com> <20081207191727.V1610@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <200812072150.44361.subbsd@gmail.com> <3a142e750812071056l50e8f464oa5169b9f3d107902@mail.gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, subbsd@gmail.com Subject: Re: Why FreeBSD not popular on hardware vendors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Dec 2008 20:16:41 -0000 Paul B. Mahol writes: > Simple solution: > Pay them or someone to do it for you, or hack it yourself, or > wait for it little longer. Given nVidia has offered to write and maintain a driver ... if we're going this route, the correct solution is to pay someone to make the changes nVidia wants in the kernel. I don't understznd the vm system, but it's possible others might find those improvements useful as well. I'm not prepared to spec the project or organize the contributions; I _would_ probably be willing to make a donation. Robert Huff