From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org  Wed Jul 10 03:18:00 2019
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E089A15ECC14
 for <freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Wed, 10 Jul 2019 03:18:00 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [18.222.6.11])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net",
 Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADB686D09F
 for <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>; Wed, 10 Jul 2019 03:17:59 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com)
Received: from lonesome.com (unknown [18.188.142.31])
 by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30B191FCD4;
 Wed, 10 Jul 2019 03:17:53 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 03:17:50 +0000
From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To: Denis Polygalov <dpolyg@gmail.com>
Cc: Robert Crowston <crowston@protonmail.com>, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: raspberry pi 4
Message-ID: <20190710031750.GB28522@lonesome.com>
References: <20190709161243.GC4904@mon.zyxst.net>
 <HZPxf8oyosxDF2kVxJHXYBDY9ULZtF5VHU8FnEslTS9JS-dMsA1G61OnXEHmL0xUVPqZTeF2Q_Z9F58Su81uDDiX86do5d3mqFG7q4teJlw=@protonmail.com>
 <CAHxjC0-VJmQK=feqAb2H9sSAwHXo8=KTYr3Os72WBB58SaoiMg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHxjC0-VJmQK=feqAb2H9sSAwHXo8=KTYr3Os72WBB58SaoiMg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: ADB686D09F
X-Spamd-Bar: /
Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org
X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.18 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[];
 RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[];
 FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3];
 TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[];
 IP_SCORE(-0.24)[ip: (0.03), ipnet: 18.220.0.0/14(0.14), asn: 16509(-1.34),
 country: US(-0.06)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain];
 DMARC_NA(0.00)[lonesome.com]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[];
 NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.78)[0.783,0];
 NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.96)[-0.955,0];
 TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[];
 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED(-0.20)[11.6.222.18.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.2];
 MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mail.soaustin.net];
 NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.45)[-0.451,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[];
 FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[gmail.com]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[];
 R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+];
 ASN(0.00)[asn:16509, ipnet:18.220.0.0/14, country:US];
 FREEMAIL_CC(0.00)[protonmail.com]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[];
 RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." <freebsd-arm.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arm>,
 <mailto:freebsd-arm-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2019 03:18:01 -0000

On Wed, Jul 10, 2019 at 09:52:43AM +0900, Denis Polygalov wrote:
> but please let's enhance support of the good OS (FreeBSD)
> on a *good* boards.

Despite any technical advantages or disadvantages, RPI has the most
mindshare, and we would be foolish to avoid it.

Disclaimer: I'm already grossly overcommitted, but of course if someone
handed me a board, a set of specs, and a large check, anything could
happen :-)

mcl