From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jul 25 11:30:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0615437B401 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:30:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.inka.de (quechua.inka.de [212.227.14.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C6243E42 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 11:30:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mailnull@mips.inka.de) Received: from kemoauc.mips.inka.de (uucp@) by mail.inka.de with local-bsmtp id 17XnNk-0007Ji-00; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 20:30:36 +0200 Received: from kemoauc.mips.inka.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kemoauc.mips.inka.de (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g6PI9705045217 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 20:09:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from mailnull@localhost.mips.inka.de) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by kemoauc.mips.inka.de (8.12.5/8.12.5/Submit) id g6PI960V045216 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 25 Jul 2002 20:09:07 +0200 (CEST) From: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) Subject: USE_AUTOCONF vs. autoconf-2.53? Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 18:09:06 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Originator: naddy@mips.inka.de (Christian Weisgerber) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Is my understanding correct that USE_AUTOCONF forces the use of autoconf213, and that you have to manually duplicate the functionality of USE_AUTOCONF if a port requires autoconf (2.53)? -- Christian "naddy" Weisgerber naddy@mips.inka.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message