From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Mar 27 13:43:19 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id NAA10217 for current-outgoing; Mon, 27 Mar 1995 13:43:19 -0800
Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id NAA10187; Mon, 27 Mar 1995 13:43:02 -0800
Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin.Root.COM [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.8/8.6.5) with ESMTP id NAA02243; Mon, 27 Mar 1995 13:42:54 -0800
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.11/8.6.5) with SMTP id NAA00465; Mon, 27 Mar 1995 13:42:54 -0800
Message-Id: <199503272142.NAA00465@corbin.Root.COM>
X-Authentication-Warning: corbin.Root.COM: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@freefall.cdrom.com>
cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: shared library versioning 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 27 Mar 95 13:37:42 PST."
             <9650.796340262@freefall.cdrom.com> 
From: David Greenman <davidg@Root.COM>
Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 1995 13:42:53 -0800
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

>> I didn't see a bump, but as a result of this change, it should be.
>
>So instead of said binaries failing catastrophically on a link
>error, they just fail to find the library in question and fail
>catastrophically on a missing library?

   No, ld.so looks for the highest rev library with the same major number.

-DG