Date: Mon, 1 May 2017 16:43:40 +0000 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> To: Christian Jachmann <Jachmann@unitix.org> Cc: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: System Clang vs. Ports Clang Message-ID: <20170501164340.GC77098@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> In-Reply-To: <20170430114652.GA91888@hurx.thc> References: <20170430114652.GA91888@hurx.thc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--8GpibOaaTibBMecb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 01:46:52PM +0200, Christian Jachmann wrote: >=20 > Hi, >=20 > when building dri or libEGL, llvm40 needs to be build from the ports. >=20 > Running 11-Stable allready has llvm40 in the Base, so there is no need, t= o build it again from the ports.=20 >=20 > Or am i wrong ? dri has a runtime dependency on llvm, presumably for libraries and thus the port needs to be built as we don't provide the llvm libraries in the base system. -- Brooks --8GpibOaaTibBMecb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJZB2W7AAoJEKzQXbSebgfA2WgH/iZtwytR4QvV01kwrQX2AFwM lXKtKcKRDlYxDLpC9olT/KKLMwJZUYp4F9G2nEPG3oKVrvE1kOLhtUIn8Wal409g TYE6l7DfW/aQyd7RWE28qC1foEpXX+NazsY3YxbbIPuq9HnP8eseznwZzEJ7/awz uVBMqmcATWLvbtDni9Aql9Ctwcn9ra9nYzzjlJPyP2bTOM2hRTOsJWvp8jSn7Rvp B7XIo5NV9n4mNFwiTMFj65z1YeDDvwyoMTEOM+3Kbv+Qw/yPsEAG+bJFIUNR7Qju sua6farLzsYHqSx3w+FpzFH/wUUvl612nbECPtOfRNcbcHiA6kAKTTQRyt8p7vs= =wnJb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8GpibOaaTibBMecb--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170501164340.GC77098>