From owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 28 21:35:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C77E16A4B3 for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:35:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4BF43F3F for ; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 21:35:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk) Received: from scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.162] helo=localhost) by tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1A3pkX-0004Tm-KW for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 05:35:05 +0100 Received: from rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.161]) by localhost (scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.162]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 17172-01 for ; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 05:35:05 +0100 (BST) Received: from gateway.wadham.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.161.253]) by rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 4.20) id 1A3pkX-0004Ti-72 for freebsd-chat@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Sep 2003 05:35:05 +0100 Received: (qmail 11564 invoked by uid 0); 29 Sep 2003 04:35:05 -0000 Received: from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk by gateway by uid 71 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (sweep: 2.14/3.71. spamassassin: 2.53. Clear:. Processed in 3.237815 secs); 29 Sep 2003 04:35:05 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk via gateway X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.16 (Clear:. Processed in 3.237815 secs) Received: from dhcp1131.wadham.ox.ac.uk (HELO piii600.wadham.ox.ac.uk) (163.1.161.131) by gateway.wadham.ox.ac.uk with SMTP; 29 Sep 2003 04:35:01 -0000 Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.1.20030929053024.02ce0008@popserver.sfu.ca> X-Sender: cperciva@popserver.sfu.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2 Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 05:34:56 +0100 To: Brad Knowles , des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) From: Colin Percival In-Reply-To: References: <2493.67.85.96.168.1064692382.squirrel@www.wingfoot.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: Glenn Sieb cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What are people using for MUA's nowadays? X-BeenThere: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Non technical items related to the community List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 04:35:10 -0000 At 16:35 28/09/2003 +0200, Brad Knowles wrote: >At 12:23 PM +0200 2003/09/28, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: >> The proper Unix thing is a single LF. DOS and Windows use the CR/LF >> combo; CR alone is a Mac convention. > > I remembered that CR/LF were used in there somewhat, but=20 > obviously was wrong in where they were used. Sigh.... > > Makes you wish that there were international standards for these= =20 > things that everyone had to follow. ;) International standards, such as the RFCs? Every text-protocol RFC I've= =20 seen has been pretty clear about requiring CRLF pairs. Colin Percival