Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 14:25:16 -0600 From: "Brandon D. Valentine" <brandon@dvalentine.com> To: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> Cc: des@ofug.org, fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone working on fsck? Message-ID: <20030318202516.GB25577@geekpunk.net> In-Reply-To: <20030318110852.438ffd2e.flynn@energyhq.homeip.net> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0303171204380.70394-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <xzpznnt2dxp.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <20030318110852.438ffd2e.flynn@energyhq.homeip.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[ Cc: trimmed. ] On Tue, Mar 18, 2003 at 11:08:52AM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote: > On Tue, 18 Mar 2003 10:59:14 +0100 Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > Let's rather work on getting a working log-structured filesystem > > committed so we don't *need* fsck for filesystems that large. > > Rather than reinventing the wheel, how about porting NetBSD's LFS to > FreeBSD? Granted it's not 100% reliable yet, but it's improving. I'd > rather have that than wait for JFS4BSD to be ready. In fact, I'd > volunteer to work with my (limited) knowledge. While I do not have the time nor expertise to work on any such project at this time I would *love* to see FreeBSD developers work with the NetBSD folks toward reviving LFS. I think there is a definite demand for a BSD-licensed log-structured filesystem and the most logical place to begin is with the extant example. Brandon D. Valentine -- brandon@dvalentine.com http://www.geekpunk.net Pseudo-Random Googlism: nashville is considered to have a retail trade area with a radius of approximately 100 miles and encompassing a population of more than two million To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-fs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030318202516.GB25577>