From owner-freebsd-net Thu Apr 4 0:21:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from hardy.inty.net (hardy.inty.net [195.224.93.245]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781AD37B41C for ; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 00:21:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from inty.hq.inty.net (inty.hq.inty.net [213.38.150.150]) by hardy.inty.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g348LbF15085; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 09:21:37 +0100 (BST) Received: from tariq ([10.0.1.156]) by inty.hq.inty.net (8.12.1/8.12.1) with SMTP id g348LacG064064; Thu, 4 Apr 2002 09:21:36 +0100 (BST) From: "Tariq Rashid" To: "Sam Leffler" , Subject: RE: kame ipsec vs. openbsd ipsec / netgraph ipsec node? Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 09:24:11 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <2c1d01c1db3b$460c7720$52557f42@errno.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Importance: Normal X-Sender-IP: 10.0.1.156 X-INT-DeliveryDone: g348LacG064064 X-suppress-rcpt-virus-notify: yes X-Skip-Virus-Check: yes X-Virus-Checked: 11584 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On a slightly side note, I'd much prefer to see FreeBSD with IPSEC pseudo-interfaces a la OpenBSD/linux. I'd much prefer to work with say, enc0, or ipsec1, than mess around with guf half-tunnels.... makes complex routing much easier.... Just a thought - perhaps a netgraph ipsec node is the way forward? Tariq intY (www.inty.com) has automatically scanned this email using Sophos Anti-Virus To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message