From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 31 00:16:52 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEF7616A41C for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 00:16:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from multiplay.co.uk (www1.multiplay.co.uk [212.42.16.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 539A843D1D for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 00:16:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from killing@multiplay.co.uk) Received: from vader ([212.135.219.179]) by multiplay.co.uk (multiplay.co.uk [212.42.16.7]) (MDaemon.PRO.v8.0.2.R) with ESMTP id md50001447882.msg for ; Tue, 31 May 2005 01:12:06 +0100 Message-ID: <003601c56575$ff8fcb80$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> From: "Steven Hartland" To: "Sebastian Ahndorf" References: <20050529221024.4fu2p4yjusk04k0g@mail.banot.net> <20050529212705.GA64753@xor.obsecurity.org> <1117447400.5384.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050530104928.GB79877@sr.se> <1117465224.9934.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <429B44BD.7070806@pp.nic.fi><20050530191843.GA82875@xor.obsecurity.org> <429B7DF6.8040704@it-is-warlock.de><00de01c5655f$08a4e550$b3db87d4@multiplay.co.uk> <429B8E55.6090104@it-is-warlock.de> Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 01:16:27 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="ISO-8859-15"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2527 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2527 X-Spam-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Tue, 31 May 2005 01:12:06 +0100 (not processed: message from valid local sender) X-MDRemoteIP: 212.135.219.179 X-Return-Path: killing@multiplay.co.uk X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-MDAV-Processed: multiplay.co.uk, Tue, 31 May 2005 01:12:07 +0100 Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Poor network performance: a lot of timeouts X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 00:16:53 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sebastian Ahndorf" > Steven Hartland wrote: >> >> Quite a few 100tx nic / switch combinations misbehave when both >> sides are not set to the same be that 100fdx or auto sense. I've actually >> never seen a problem with 100tx autoneg as long as both ends had >> it selected and there wasn't a cable problem. >> > > I was talking about cheap switches (and that's pretty the same with > adsl-routers). There is usually no way to configure (at the switch) > which speed/duplex should be used and if you set your nic to a specific > mode, the switch doesn't mention this. So it keeps on sending it's > autosensepakets and waits for response. It get's timeouts and thats what > pulls down the networkperformance. > So you have to set your nic to autosense and you'll get a better > performance, cause the nic responces to autosense. I think your just repeating what I said in different words :P Steve ================================================ This e.mail is private and confidential between Multiplay (UK) Ltd. and the person or entity to whom it is addressed. In the event of misdirection, the recipient is prohibited from using, copying, printing or otherwise disseminating it or any information contained in it. In the event of misdirection, illegible or incomplete transmission please telephone (023) 8024 3137 or return the E.mail to postmaster@multiplay.co.uk.