From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 15 10:36:14 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C28F016A41F for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:36:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adam@nhh.hu) Received: from hif.hu (www.hfjk.nhh.hu [193.68.33.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91FC43D49 for ; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:36:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from adam@nhh.hu) Received: by fd.hif.hu id <118195>; Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:36:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <43006B5F.90700@LainOS.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.3 September 26, 2003 Message-Id: <05Aug15.123608cest.118195@fd.hif.hu> From: "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?=C1d=E1m_Szilveszter_dr=2E?=" Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 12:26:25 +0200 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on MainDomino/HIF(Release 6.5.4|March 27, 2005) at 08/15/2005 12:36:05, Serialize complete at 08/15/2005 12:36:05 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Subject: Re: mounting device acd0t01 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 10:36:14 -0000 Hello, Chris Gilbert wrote on 2005.08.15 12:15:59: > Well, AFAIK, *cd*t* (like acd0t01) are for multisession disks. > > I have personally only ever seen this when dealing with audio CDs, with > a tXX for every audio track. > > You shouldn't have to mount those at all. > > Mounting it as a ISO CD9660 filesystem is impossible if it is an audio > CD, since the data in those tracks is PCM and not a filesystem. (obviously) Except if it is one of those mixed mode CDs that contain numerous audio tracks and then some multimedia bonus material at the end. In this case I need to mount the multimedia part which is normal ISO9660 fs. In very old days, with the wcd* driver, this used to be possible. But recently, beginning with 4.x and then on 5.0-CURRENT and early 6.0-CURRENT, I either got an error message, or in some cases even a panic. (I have not tested with -CURRENT lately, but will soon just as a datapoint) Regards: Szilveszter ADAM Budapest Hungary