From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Nov 14 0:31: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9657137B404 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:31:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from vectors.cx (manifold.vectors.cx [64.163.147.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381CE43E42 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:31:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from monkey@vectors.cx) Received: from vectors.cx (c4899a7b6ff37c5a61d731bd65b18274@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vectors.cx (8.12.6/8.12.4) with ESMTP id gAE8Wmsp033586; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:32:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from monkey@vectors.cx) Received: (from monkey@localhost) by vectors.cx (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gAE8Wmp5033585; Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:32:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from monkey) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2002 00:32:48 -0800 From: Adam Weinberger To: "E.S." Cc: Kent Stewart , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: make buildkernel says device atapicam is unknown!!?? Message-ID: <20021114083247.GH18778@vectors.cx> References: <200211132359.26336.bsdterm@HotPOP.com> <200211140144.18808.bsdterm@HotPOP.com> <3DD3577B.5010501@owt.com> <200211140219.11408.bsdterm@HotPOP.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-action=pgp-signed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200211140219.11408.bsdterm@HotPOP.com> X-Editor: Vim 6.1 http://www.vim.org X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5 http://www.mutt.org X-PGP-Key: http://www.vectors.cx/pgp.key.txt X-URL: http://www.vectors.cx http://www.crackula.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >> (11.14.2002 @ 0019 PST): E.S. said, in 4.8K: << > I've considered it, but isn't -STABLE a bit less stable than -RELEASE, since > the source in it is newer? >> end of "Re: make buildkernel says device atapicam is unknown!!??" from E.S. << - -RELEASE is just a snapshot of -STABLE at a specific point in time. In general, -STABLE is supposed to remain stable enough to be a -RELEASE at nearly any given point in time. Theoretically. Sortof. I have *never* had -STABLE not boot up for me, or cause the massive experimental problems that one might associate with -CURRENT. /Adam - -- Adam Weinberger adam@vectors.cx adamw@FreeBSD.ORG -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE901+vo8KM2ULHQ/0RAqzxAKDEKa6dFXiSROZo/2A2VSgJNVap5gCfVwxh TuK0PF7SaZheEKxQlBwMmf4= =qaSQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message