From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 25 16:25:19 2012
Return-Path: <owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53])
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672C915A;
 Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:25:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ae@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (hub.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.136])
 by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C64263B4C1A;
 Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:25:17 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <508967E3.3070508@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 20:25:07 +0400
From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <ae@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:16.0) Gecko/20121023 Thunderbird/16.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r242079 - in head: sbin/ipfw share/man/man4 sys/conf
 sys/net sys/netinet sys/netinet6 sys/netpfil/ipfw
References: <201210250939.q9P9dF0q022970@svn.freebsd.org>
 <508960C2.6030003@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <508960C2.6030003@freebsd.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org,
 src-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current
 <svn-src-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-src-head>,
 <mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-head>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-src-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head>,
 <mailto:svn-src-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 16:25:19 -0000

On 25.10.2012 19:54, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> I still don't agree with naming the sysctl net.pfil.forward.  This
> type of forwarding is a property of IPv4 and IPv6 and thus should
> be put there.  Pfil hooking can be on layer 2, 2-bridging, 3 and
> who knows where else in the future.  Forwarding works only for IPv46.
> 
> You haven't even replied to my comment on net@.  Please change the
> sysctl location and name to its appropriate place.

Hi Andre,

There were two replies related to this subject, you did not replied to
them and i thought that you became agree.
So, if not, what you think about the name net.pfil.ipforward?

> Also an MFC's after 2 weeks must ensure that compiling with IPFIREWALL_
> FORWARD enabled the sysctl at the same time to keep kernel configs
> within 9-stable working.

Yes, it will work like that.

-- 
WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov