From owner-freebsd-emulation  Thu May  2 13:58:12 1996
Return-Path: owner-emulation
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id NAA25103
          for emulation-outgoing; Thu, 2 May 1996 13:58:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mytus.blitz.com (root@mytus.blitz.com [204.32.90.161])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id NAA25098
          for <emulation@freebsd.org>; Thu, 2 May 1996 13:58:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mytus.blitz.com (pace@localhost.opustel.com [127.0.0.1]) by mytus.blitz.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id QAA17724; Thu, 2 May 1996 16:57:59 -0400
Message-Id: <199605022057.QAA17724@mytus.blitz.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.6 3/24/96
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
cc: Sujal Patel <smpatel@umiacs.umd.edu>, emulation@freebsd.org,
        mycroft@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: New DOS emulator snapshot (fwd) 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 02 May 1996 13:52:27 PDT."
             <2661.831070347@time.cdrom.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Thu, 02 May 1996 16:57:57 -0400
From: Pace Willisson <pace@blitz.com>
Sender: owner-emulation@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

I'm sorry for the confusion.  I didn't notice the "netbsd" part in the recent 
announcement of a new snapshot - I guess they are not as concerned with
avoiding significant changes.  I'll wait until I see an announcement
of a freebsd update, and I'll give it another shot.

Pace