From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Feb 11 08:54:59 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49FD7BE9
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:54:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org
 (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:3:ffe0:406a:0:50:2])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 27AB1E91
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:54:59 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org
 (phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org [127.0.1.5])
 by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id
 t1B8swa9074930
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:54:58 GMT
 (envelope-from root@phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org)
Received: (from root@localhost)
 by phabric-backend.isc.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t1B8sw9W074929;
 Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:54:58 GMT (envelope-from root)
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:54:58 +0000
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
From: "davide (Davide Italiano)" <phabric-noreply@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: [Differential] [Commented On] D1809: [sockbuf] Don't expose lock
 details when isn't needed
Message-ID: <2985078bfa16e89f498437d6492a2d65@localhost.localdomain>
X-Priority: 3
Thread-Topic: D1809: [sockbuf] Don't expose lock details when isn't needed
X-Herald-Rules: none
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-ejmjsmhpyau7otpbjnc6>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-22avn2hssqzufmcg2crf>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-mqlw6f5jjiqhbs4co7yd>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-nb2boxugvmpo7syia5md>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-s22ldiy33wseno7vfmzs>
X-Phabricator-To: <PHID-USER-xs5piezwnsa6epounp3t>
X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-USER-mhzsgq7klbzjcspjzvus>
X-Phabricator-Cc: <PHID-MLST-c3bj6mfydtlqmuethodc>
In-Reply-To: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-itcsjouioqxprcrqy7hw-req@FreeBSD.org>
References: <differential-rev-PHID-DREV-itcsjouioqxprcrqy7hw-req@FreeBSD.org>
Thread-Index: ZDUyNzQ5ZWQxMTRmZDFiNGM0NTM4Yzk5MDEwIFTbGOI=
X-Phabricator-Sent-This-Message: Yes
X-Mail-Transport-Agent: MetaMTA
X-Auto-Response-Suppress: All
X-Phabricator-Mail-Tags: <differential-comment>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2015 08:54:59 -0000

davide added a comment.

Robert,
an added (somewhat related) note. 
SCTP has already its own sockbuf(s) and this makes integration very hackish in the tree. IIRC glebius experienced this himself while working on sendfile(), and I'm pretty sure rrs@ is kind of familiar with the problem. Introducing a better abstraction for sockbuf might help with this.

REVISION DETAIL
  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1809

To: davide, kmacy, np, rrs, lstewart, rwatson
Cc: julian, freebsd-net