From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Tue Mar 19 00:23:57 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B915152A03B for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:23:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from smtp-out-so.shaw.ca (smtp-out-so.shaw.ca [64.59.136.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8277C85B8F; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:23:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from spqr.komquats.com ([70.67.125.17]) by shaw.ca with ESMTPA id 62Xfhxcz7o7SQ62XhhBi8B; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 18:23:46 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=Go88BX9C c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=VFtTW3WuZNDh6VkGe7fA3g==:117 a=VFtTW3WuZNDh6VkGe7fA3g==:17 a=jpOVt7BSZ2e4Z31A5e1TngXxSK0=:19 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=NTGMnVQrEZIA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=ECduHTbH4FdYAarN7FUA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy [10.1.1.91]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A659B14; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 17:23:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x2J0NgTp053255; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 17:23:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com) Received: from slippy (cy@localhost) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id x2J0NgCQ053252; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 17:23:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com) Message-Id: <201903190023.x2J0NgCQ053252@slippy.cwsent.com> X-Authentication-Warning: slippy.cwsent.com: cy owned process doing -bs Reply-to: Cy Schubert From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.cschubert.com/ To: Andriy Gapon cc: Cy Schubert , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: leaked swap? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 18 Mar 2019 17:34:03 +0200." <2b27d1b6-b956-c27e-709b-08fa5d54e696@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <53250.1552955022.1@slippy> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 17:23:42 -0700 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfGE7huEWkxKcALhhSURRYnB2r6/161VGbnyNYRHkuUSjtB6bQ0+9KR43HJGgyxHbiUrLyWZPpMzjBCG7xnvuUsyDsUkp+Dr7Hymsm++dO0OVCOe5uQOU fJu6bKjfKd28ivHYilB51X8F9yX+qzH+JqVNvMoEz4Szeswjh26Azq9kBq7lqVVSouTSkKgRMDzmzIJQXXUmrSEAmXc4OjoaeHY= X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 8277C85B8F X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.20 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-2.12)[ip: (-5.36), ipnet: 64.59.128.0/20(-2.90), asn: 6327(-2.24), country: CA(-0.09)]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; HAS_XAW(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[spqr.komquats.com]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.88)[-0.877,0]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000,0]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[17.125.67.70.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.11]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6327, ipnet:64.59.128.0/20, country:CA]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[138.136.59.64.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 00:23:57 -0000 In message <2b27d1b6-b956-c27e-709b-08fa5d54e696@FreeBSD.org>, Andriy Gapo= n writes: > On 18/03/2019 17:30, Cy Schubert wrote: > > Top did not report any swap used by git and GB of swap were used. > > Last time I checked top reported something very different as swap. > IIRC, its notion of swap usage comes from the age when the swap granular= ity was > a whole process. OK, in the strictest sense. The BSD definition of swap is the same as IBM'= s z/OS, a whole address space.