From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Sep 8 16:19:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (leviathan.inethouston.net [66.64.12.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E675E37B405 for ; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 16:19:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B800210F43E; Sat, 8 Sep 2001 18:19:44 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2001 18:19:44 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: Marcel Moolenaar Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: linux_base: update in place or repo copy? Message-ID: <20010908181944.A73478@leviathan.inethouston.net> Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Mail-Followup-To: Marcel Moolenaar , ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20010908131518.A1238@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20010908131518.A1238@athlon.pn.xcllnt.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.3-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 01:15:18PM -0700, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > Gang, > > We have a choice to make. I can not update the current linux_base > port in place without breaking a large portion of the current > linux_base depending ports. We did that for 6.1 and there have > been times I wished we didn't. > I sent in a repo request what seems like a week ago(probably a few days at most). If we aren't going to need the repo we should warn the repo gods of this change. -- David W. Chapman Jr. dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message