From owner-freebsd-arch Mon Feb 19 10:54:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC9337B503 for ; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:54:18 -0800 (PST) Received: (from dillon@localhost) by earth.backplane.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f1JIsBQ37549; Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:54:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dillon) Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 10:54:11 -0800 (PST) From: Matt Dillon Message-Id: <200102191854.f1JIsBQ37549@earth.backplane.com> To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Terry Lambert , josb@cncdsl.com, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DJBDNS vs. BIND References: <200102191012.DAA17412@usr05.primenet.com> <200102191825.f1JIPde37350@earth.backplane.com> <20010219103531.N6641@fw.wintelcom.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG :I think Terry is tossing the idea around that it would or couldn't be :possible for a company aquisition to transfer all software licenses. :... : :If this isn't how it works, then whomever bought Best might have :been in for a lot of trouble depending on how much Best itself :relied on softupdates to function. If the license was non-transferable :even through aquisition then it might render a lot of Best's :technology useless. : :All this is speculation, I'm sure Best liked softupdates, but could :have managed without them. :) : :-- :-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org] Unless the license explicitly indicates that it is not transferable, then a merger or buyout will have no effect on it. Patent-related licenses often have such a clause in them in order to allow the patent holder to renegotiate the terms (e.g. if a tiny company is aquired by a larger one). A site-license, on the otherhand, does not usually have such a clause because it is already inherently limiting the number of seats the software can be used with. Many open source licenses distinguish between commercial and non-commercial use, and a change of status would certainly apply there (e.g. a non-profit company merges with a for-profit company), but I don't know a single open source / freeware license that gives a damn whether a commercial company is being aquired by another commercial company. Most commercial-use licenses are site licenses. Custom license deals made by very large companies, e.g. a contract for MS to supply desktop software for example, are more likely to have change of control clauses in them for the purposes of renegotiation. But for smaller companies you rarely see this sort of thing because it's a waste of time and money. -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message