Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2012 15:54:38 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> Cc: toolchain@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Un-staticise the toolchain Message-ID: <20120430225438.GB60636@dragon.NUXI.org> In-Reply-To: <D92D6EA0-62F5-42A9-A802-8CF0D43A4D62@gid.co.uk> References: <20120426093548.GR2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <5BCE2E77-2B45-43B7-AB1F-6E6C13B87B34@gid.co.uk> <20120428031212.GE80419@dragon.NUXI.org> <D92D6EA0-62F5-42A9-A802-8CF0D43A4D62@gid.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Apr 28, 2012 at 11:03:17AM +0100, Bob Bishop wrote: > Yes. You to have a statically linked /rescue/sh on board, so what's the > point of /bin/sh being dynamic? While you and I agree on this, the primary reason we went with a dynamically linked root was for PAM and NSS support -- which are dlopen'ed. And thus requires using a shared libc. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120430225438.GB60636>