From owner-freebsd-questions  Thu Jan  6  2:49:41 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from exchange.prism.co.za (exchange.prism.co.za [196.34.63.66])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669C715450
	for <freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  6 Jan 2000 02:49:37 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from alwyns@littlecruncher.prizm.dhs.org)
Received: from littlecruncher.prizm.dhs.org (196.34.63.201 [196.34.63.201]) by exchange.prism.co.za with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2448.0)
	id CKVJLKZP; Thu, 6 Jan 2000 12:51:11 +0200
Received: by littlecruncher.prizm.dhs.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id CE52B93; Thu,  6 Jan 2000 12:51:19 +0200 (SAST)
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2000 12:51:11 +0200
From: Alwyn Schoeman <alwyns@littlecruncher.prizm.dhs.org>
To: Adam <bsdx@looksharp.net>
Cc: "Alexey N. Dokuchaev" <danfe@inet.ssc.nsu.ru>,
	Salvo Bartolotta <bartequi@nojunk.com>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: FFS vs ext2fs (Was: Re: Not enough information)
Message-ID: <20000106125047.F8865@littlecruncher.prizm.dhs.org>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001060514270.17839-100000@turtle.looksharp.net> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001060517060.17839-100000@turtle.looksharp.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001060517060.17839-100000@turtle.looksharp.net>; from bsdx@looksharp.net on Thu, Jan 06, 2000 at 05:17:34AM -0500
Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Another point thats good about ports that I didn't mention, is that
its got a very high success rate if you compare it to compiling source
from scratch yourself. (especially if you're doing it for the first time,
imagine openssl, mod_ssl, apache) HA! (:


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message