From owner-cvs-all Fri Sep 14 9:36:18 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from kayak.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.bayarea.net [209.128.86.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FEBA37B40B; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:35:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.201]) by kayak.xcllnt.net (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f8EGZAm70143; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 09:35:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel@kayak.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.11.6/8.11.3) id f8E8O8416632; Fri, 14 Sep 2001 01:24:08 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2001 01:24:06 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Warner Losh Cc: KATO Takenori , ru@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: hw.machine vs hw.machine_arch Message-ID: <20010914012406.B16118@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: <20010913224828.B8717@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <200109122218.f8CMIst43283@harmony.village.org> <200109130617.f8D6Hit95540@harmony.village.org> <20010913014953.B1403@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> <200109131133.f8DBXoO84286@tatu.nendai.nagoya-u.ac.jp> <200109140648.f8E6mFt19413@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200109140648.f8E6mFt19413@harmony.village.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.21i Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 12:48:15AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <20010913224828.B8717@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> Marcel Moolenaar writes: > : I don't have a pc98 to check, but I don't see the evidence in the > : code that hw.machine=pc98 on pc98. Please check. > > These are both i386 on my pc98 machine, but I may have messed up when > building the kernel on my FreeBSD/i386 machine. If it's still i386, then according to the "new" definition of these MIBs, we should change it to pc98. > : Also, given the above definition, what remains of the function of > : the hw.ispc98 MIB? > > machdep.ispc98 you mean? That is 0 on my FreeBSD/i386 boxes and 1 on > my pc98 machines. Yes, I ment machdep.ispc98. The MIB changed from hw.ispc98 to machdep.ispc98 and I was looking at Kato's commit log at the time. Both MIBs (ie hw.machine and machdep.ispc98) serve the same purpose as far as I can see, so we should be able to remove one of them (preferably machdep.ispc98). I checked the ports collection and at this time there're no ports that use the machdep.ispc98 sysctl variable. -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message