From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 20:42:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249ACC9; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 20:42:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <5213D437.30006@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 16:40:23 -0400 From: Jung-uk Kim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130814 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Moore, Robert" Subject: Re: AMT Activation ACPI warnings References: <1376348029.1469.49.camel@localhost> <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E36FECEB29@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> <1377027160.1478.5.camel@localhost> <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E36FECEB7C@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <94F2FBAB4432B54E8AACC7DFDE6C92E36FECEB7C@ORSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 20:42:21 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-08-20 15:42:12 -0400, Robert Moore wrote: > It appears to be a vendor thing. However, still in direct violation > of the ACPI spec. I believe you're correct. FYI, Linux people have "Optimus" driver and you may find some info from their work: http://bumblebee-project.org/ Especially, this looks interesting regarding _DSM encoding: https://github.com/Bumblebee-Project/bbswitch Jung-uk Kim >> -----Original Message----- From: Sean Bruno >> [mailto:sean_bruno@yahoo.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2013 >> 12:33 PM To: Moore, Robert Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: >> RE: AMT Activation ACPI warnings >> >> On Tue, 2013-08-20 at 19:20 +0000, Moore, Robert wrote: >>> We have seen at least one video vendor that uses a Buffer >>> object instead of the ACPI-required package object as the 4th >>> _DSM argument. >>> >>> >> >> The T520 has a Nvidia thingy in it. Is this something we need to >> deal with in the BSD ACPI implementation or is this a vendor >> thing? >> >> Sean > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-acpi To > unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-acpi-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.21 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSE9Q3AAoJECXpabHZMqHOsrwIAL5pIGgtv+XchpKDCENNuEUz nu9bFMltpDvZUoi/7ly9vkernIRg87XDIDJ5JkpdnVdwREsLZztbOC6aV0F1P1x4 GBEjns3CMKaTxRFgoHjXXgke0LcEunsawvN4bfYQ/WikV+hW6ZoKe2h7pC91rWP6 nK9X9ZYCmYfoMMPJbiF6ZcDhMyWA4zRKQPkKx7EA5XbkzbjMuy++DxqF9lCmQQ4y sZJtVpmlMowCFvcm2WUn6iIFVhvJZT40BKCOXFcUa8TqPtR5cV0Xg9H46kZE9tKt w5/jMbEvgwxoRLg/678tZ5qoi/Wd5MH2UKyLDHd+sxK3w4Yt56agJtI4aRWyiYw= =05PR -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----