From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Oct 7 17:14:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B68C16A4CE for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 17:14:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3576843D39 for ; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 17:14:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5D27A51262; Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:16:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:16:10 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: TM4525@aol.com Message-ID: <20041007171610.GA6746@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <198.301e6a33.2e96cbb8@aol.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <198.301e6a33.2e96cbb8@aol.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: Michael.Walker2@capita.co.uk cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 17:14:34 -0000 --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 12:41:28PM -0400, TM4525@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 10/7/04 10:17:47 AM Eastern Daylight Time, obscurity K= ris=20 > writes: > Well, it's vast :)=20 > Kris > We're waiting..5.3 is in beta and ready for your tests. Other benchmarks > show very good results compared to 4.x. >=20 > Kris > ------------------------------------------ >=20 > Quite a bunch of scientists on the FreeBSD team these days, eh? :) >=20 > why don't you post some of these impressive benchmarks to substantiate=20 > your seemingly flimsy position? On a single processor system please, for= =20 > the 99% of us who don't use SMP. Hopefully the only good reason to run=20 > 5.x won't be if you run 4 processor systems. Already done so. Kris --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBZXnaWry0BWjoQKURAps9AKDafSa0aYbsu+6Bi1WB4336SdoqRQCgu5S8 jL+QMLjcPiOm3UGRmuzeKTI= =W1jT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5--