Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 10:16:10 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: TM4525@aol.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What version of FBSD does Yahoo run? Message-ID: <20041007171610.GA6746@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <198.301e6a33.2e96cbb8@aol.com> References: <198.301e6a33.2e96cbb8@aol.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 12:41:28PM -0400, TM4525@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 10/7/04 10:17:47 AM Eastern Daylight Time, obscurity K= ris=20 > writes: > Well, it's vast :)=20 > Kris > We're waiting..5.3 is in beta and ready for your tests. Other benchmarks > show very good results compared to 4.x. >=20 > Kris > ------------------------------------------ >=20 > Quite a bunch of scientists on the FreeBSD team these days, eh? :) >=20 > why don't you post some of these impressive benchmarks to substantiate=20 > your seemingly flimsy position? On a single processor system please, for= =20 > the 99% of us who don't use SMP. Hopefully the only good reason to run=20 > 5.x won't be if you run 4 processor systems. Already done so. Kris --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBZXnaWry0BWjoQKURAps9AKDafSa0aYbsu+6Bi1WB4336SdoqRQCgu5S8 jL+QMLjcPiOm3UGRmuzeKTI= =W1jT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FL5UXtIhxfXey3p5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041007171610.GA6746>