From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 21 09:37:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC8B816A4CE for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:37:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from caliban.dreamscope.com (mail.dreamscope.com [69.55.225.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD7F43D54 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:37:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from chance@dreamscope.com) Received: by caliban.dreamscope.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 2486D4CDD2; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:36:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:36:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Chance Whaley To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040421092402.B16278@caliban.dreamscope.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Opinions on "best" NIC for high-touch applications X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:37:00 -0000 All, I have an application where I am doing quite a bit of high-touch packet fiddling and I am looking for opinions on which "standard" Gb NIC has the best driver support in 5.2 or CURRENT. In my dream world I am looking for something that supports: - IRQ mitigation / polling (absolute must) - PCI-X (absolute must) - HW checksumming - Scatter / Gather - IPsec - Jumbo frames - VLANs Thoughts?? .chance