From owner-cvs-all  Wed Feb 19 16:52:39 2003
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8B78537B401; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:52:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 85AA243F93; Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:52:36 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu)
Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30])
	by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h1K0qZ8I005630
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO);
	Wed, 19 Feb 2003 19:52:36 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from gallatin@localhost)
	by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.6/8.9.1) id h1K0qU047055;
	Wed, 19 Feb 2003 19:52:30 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu)
From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15956.9934.867715.33291@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 19:52:30 -0500 (EST)
To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com>
Cc: Scott Long <scottl@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/aac aac.c aac_pci.c
In-Reply-To: <20030219182122.N62705@patrocles.silby.com>
References: <200302192158.h1JLwYJn025529@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20030219161458.T62705@patrocles.silby.com>
	<20030219181629.A46948@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
	<20030219182122.N62705@patrocles.silby.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <cvs-all.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20cvs-all>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20cvs-all>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


Mike Silbersack writes:
 > 
 > 
 > I tried looking back to find the original message where you talked about
 > the performance boost, but I can't find it now.  Refresh my memory; was
 > the speedup present on UP systems as well?  I don't have any SMP boxes
 > here, so I'm curious as to what extent I'd be able to benchmark a
 > difference.

My interesting testboxes are all SMP, I tend not to do much UP
testing.   I'd expect that there would not be much of a speedup.

However, you may not notice much of any performance impact in
microbenchmarks like netperf with a 100Mb driver.. my driver is for a
2Gb/s + 2Gb/s device.


Drew

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message