Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 19:52:30 -0500 (EST) From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu> To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> Cc: Scott Long <scottl@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/aac aac.c aac_pci.c Message-ID: <15956.9934.867715.33291@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> In-Reply-To: <20030219182122.N62705@patrocles.silby.com> References: <200302192158.h1JLwYJn025529@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030219161458.T62705@patrocles.silby.com> <20030219181629.A46948@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu> <20030219182122.N62705@patrocles.silby.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Silbersack writes: > > > I tried looking back to find the original message where you talked about > the performance boost, but I can't find it now. Refresh my memory; was > the speedup present on UP systems as well? I don't have any SMP boxes > here, so I'm curious as to what extent I'd be able to benchmark a > difference. My interesting testboxes are all SMP, I tend not to do much UP testing. I'd expect that there would not be much of a speedup. However, you may not notice much of any performance impact in microbenchmarks like netperf with a 100Mb driver.. my driver is for a 2Gb/s + 2Gb/s device. Drew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?15956.9934.867715.33291>