From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 28 16:10:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8FE16A4CE for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2003 16:10:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (transport.cksoft.de [62.111.66.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0227543D31 for ; Sun, 28 Dec 2003 16:10:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net) Received: from transport.cksoft.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1932C1FF91D; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 01:10:08 +0100 (CET) Received: by transport.cksoft.de (Postfix, from userid 66) id 6C5E51FF90C; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 01:10:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix, from userid 1060) id 7E3E9153ED; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 00:05:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.int.zabbadoz.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73F9615329; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 00:05:22 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 00:05:22 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" X-X-Sender: bz@e0-0.zab2.int.zabbadoz.net To: Boris Staeblow In-Reply-To: <200312290042.38516.bs@dva.in-berlin.de> Message-ID: References: <200312262229.55270.bs@dva.in-berlin.de> <200312281856.14776.bs@dva.in-berlin.de> <200312290042.38516.bs@dva.in-berlin.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS cksoft-s20020300-20031204bz on transport.cksoft.de cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: need testers for a ipfw rule generation script! X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 00:10:11 -0000 On Mon, 29 Dec 2003, Boris Staeblow wrote: > On Sonntag, 28. Dezember 2003 23:27, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > > > DNS can also be TCP. > > (noted by a colleague who seemed to have a closer look at it). > > under which circumstances is a DNS TCP connection needed? > (I=B4ve never used a DNS TCP rule before - without any problem) I I remember correctly it's RFC 1035 /Transport --=20 Bjoern A. Zeeb=09=09=09=09bzeeb at Zabbadoz dot NeT 56 69 73 69 74=09=09=09=09http://www.zabbadoz.net/