From owner-p4-projects@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 14 13:20:49 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: p4-projects@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 32767) id D08B616A4CE; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 13:20:48 -0800 (PST) Delivered-To: perforce@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A880116A4CE for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 13:20:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.speakeasy.net (mail5.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2695143FBF for ; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 13:20:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 30422 invoked from network); 14 Nov 2003 21:20:46 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO server.baldwin.cx) ([216.27.160.63]) (envelope-sender )encrypted SMTP for ; 14 Nov 2003 21:20:46 -0000 Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (gw1.twc.weather.com [216.133.140.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAELKhEW008115; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 16:20:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.5.4 on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <200311141846.hAEIkIap057379@repoman.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 16:20:40 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Peter Wemm X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: Perforce Change Reviews Subject: RE: PERFORCE change 42350 for review X-BeenThere: p4-projects@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: p4 projects tree changes List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 21:20:49 -0000 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 21:20:49 -0000 On 14-Nov-2003 Peter Wemm wrote: > http://perforce.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=42350 > > Change 42350 by peter@peter_overcee on 2003/11/14 10:46:16 > > converge with -current a bit. I dont know if jhb intends to commit this > change that I originally picked up via jhb_acpipci or not. No, installnig atpic handlers by default is the better solution. > Affected files ... > > .. //depot/projects/hammer/sys/amd64/amd64/intr_machdep.c#9 edit > > Differences ... > > ==== //depot/projects/hammer/sys/amd64/amd64/intr_machdep.c#9 (text+ko) ==== > > @@ -106,7 +106,6 @@ > } > intrcnt_register(isrc); > interrupt_sources[vector] = isrc; > - isrc->is_pic->pic_enable_intr(isrc); > mtx_unlock_spin(&intr_table_lock); > return (0); > } > @@ -132,6 +131,7 @@ > ithread_priority(flags), flags, cookiep); > if (error == 0) { > intrcnt_updatename(isrc); > + isrc->is_pic->pic_enable_intr(isrc); > isrc->is_pic->pic_enable_source(isrc); > } > return (error); -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/