From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 7 11:34:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BAF3106566C for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:34:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@vizion2000.net) Received: from dns1.vizion2000.net (77-99-36-42.cable.ubr04.chap.blueyonder.co.uk [77.99.36.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E89D8FC08 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 11:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by dns1.vizion2000.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 93D6434D442; Mon, 7 Sep 2009 12:34:05 +0100 (BST) From: David Southwell Organization: Voice & Vision To: Alexander Churanov Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 12:34:05 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/7.2-RELEASE-p3; KDE/4.3.1; amd64; ; ) References: <200908261507.56373.david@vizion2000.net> <200909051053.17152.david@vizion2000.net> <3cb459ed0909070357l47ecf543y2cb2fde674ba3969@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3cb459ed0909070357l47ecf543y2cb2fde674ba3969@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200909071234.05540.david@vizion2000.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: boost-python-libs and associated compile errors -SOLVED X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2009 11:34:09 -0000 > 2009/9/5 David Southwell : > > I should have mentioned that openbabel & kdeedu4 also then compiled > > without problem. I have no idea what caused the original failure or how > > the cure could have been connected to the recompiling of gnome2-2.26.3. > > However I can report that immediately before the recompile I again tried > > to compile boost-python- libs and it then failed with errors identical to > > those copied into this thread. > > > > David > > It's nice to know that your issue is solved. > However, I am not going to investigate into this right know since I'm > busy with updating boost to 1.40. > > Alexander, > maintainer of devel/boost-* > Sounds reasonable to me.. at least if anyone gets the same problem they can apply the same magic and see if it works for them!! Thanks for all your input and for your work with boost*.. it is much appreciated. David