From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 11 14:43:21 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C77D16A418; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:43:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from estrabd@gmail.com) Received: from bc1.hpc.lsu.edu (bc1.hpc.lsu.edu [130.39.198.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB72B13C43E; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:43:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from estrabd@gmail.com) Received: from bc1.hpc.lsu.edu (localhost.hpc.lsu.edu [127.0.0.1]) by bc1.hpc.lsu.edu (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m0BE0jrM055364; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:00:45 GMT (envelope-from estrabd@gmail.com) Received: (from estrabd@localhost) by bc1.hpc.lsu.edu (8.14.1/8.13.8/Submit) id m0BE0jZd055363; Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:00:45 GMT (envelope-from estrabd@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: bc1.hpc.lsu.edu: estrabd set sender to estrabd@gmail.com using -f Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:00:45 +0000 From: "B. Estrade" To: Harti Brandt Message-ID: <20080111140045.GX6201@bc1.hpc.lsu.edu> References: <47873B06.9010603@riscworks.net> <200801111058.m0BAwAMG001075@lurza.secnetix.de> <20080111140144.59498431.timo.schoeler@riscworks.net> <47876B39.3040703@FreeBSD.org> <20080111145128.abb76a0a.timo.schoeler@riscworks.net> <20080111145557.C60251@knop-beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080111145557.C60251@knop-beagle.kn.op.dlr.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i mailed-by: estrabd@lsu.edu Cc: Timo Schoeler , freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD's problems as seen by the BSDForen.de community X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:43:21 -0000 On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 02:59:26PM +0100, Harti Brandt wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jan 2008, Timo Schoeler wrote: > > TS>No, I didn't. I said that the work is done ineffectively as he's doing > TS>underprioritized stuff. Working on higher prioritized stuff would be > TS>more efficient, and would help the project even more. > TS> > TS>Given the assumption that the developer is able to do both, the Xmas > TS>tree as well as importing ZFS v9 into the tree. > TS> > TS>(I don't see the point that when somebody is really *capable* of doing > TS>both things, why should (s)he do the 'lower priority' thing. If you > TS>are at the olympic stadium and you're the best sprinter, you wouldn't > TS>join the marathon...!) > > Sorry, this is just crap. I'm a rather bad guitar player, at least much worse > than I'm a programmer. Yet I enjoy playing Joe Pass at 1/4 the speed while > I could import ZFS during that time ... People just bring to FreeBSD what they > like to do, not what would be the best for you or others. If you want them > to change priorities according to YOUR needs, pay them money. Sorry for the additional noise, but - amen! That last sentence is a very key point, summarized very nicely. B > > harti > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"