From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 9 14:04:57 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A6AC32 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 14:04:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com (mail-la0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6457E8FC13 for ; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 14:04:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id j13so1743690lah.13 for ; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 06:04:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=JytpH+dZmfBIfVCUp1CncSly/DyRxxBVkB5DcY+kGZo=; b=leuA37TgauUN+VdrhUGHKmVbeGcvlm8S2UOiRbUhVto28ZlK3SM3nWxvYIwEWi+MSr 5aQwox/KsIJvnZH/fIJeRRCbmRNCf380gAWRV0L7OHXRigfYSo5mRSwr/DKy+9Yj4jym AGSaiSZTAuGzLJDkjj7V2xDGvyWHg7TVqVJHw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=JytpH+dZmfBIfVCUp1CncSly/DyRxxBVkB5DcY+kGZo=; b=NyMrKjV1QORqkTqMxRUX3jkZOekh9BHyItHuurfozvrOAHKlnQ0sA2BpyYLV+3JRcy 0bhexi11wHRUQBdvSeo2eIeq/6I6wunNtzxTpgaZ09A1Lm6elfmhlfqDGD62HR1QSoby cOBZ9V0xIzyaDuHvrT3BHuNr14usV49BKwP1VcsmolElT244q5M7YoyBYyZ0jXtRCkmM 7eOg6EaUe4IGnSJAZ5rmKBdCSA3vtUKvEgK7Xn8Q/NbqdEQ3Xn+L13NPvcafm102zNE4 iHv1Nx8K4vy1izjNXVLDk5QqOVoJR8b5oMI1+M8tZaEMA+74EJ/jrcYhV78105cg8y5z HVDQ== Received: by 10.112.83.100 with SMTP id p4mr4820176lby.96.1355061895797; Sun, 09 Dec 2012 06:04:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.43.229 with HTTP; Sun, 9 Dec 2012 06:04:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1355060892204-5767785.post@n5.nabble.com> References: <201212090318.UAA11257@lariat.net> <50C412F6.7040300@sdf.org> <201212090526.26535.lumiwa@gmail.com> <1355060892204-5767785.post@n5.nabble.com> From: Eitan Adler Date: Sun, 9 Dec 2012 09:04:25 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Will we get a RELEASE-9.1 for Christmas? To: Jakub Lach Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlSp4fRsIa6bZhRdvMGHt8Otmwu8ORTyY4dLwlKxWx2TY2Jk958MhdRBMFBQMb8JNftukZC Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2012 14:04:58 -0000 On 9 December 2012 08:48, Jakub Lach wrote: > This is good answer for end users, not so much when > somebody is genuinely concerned if there were some > unforeseen issues. Agreed. Companies need predictability. FWIW: The ports tree is open now (ports branch was tagged). The 9.1.0 src branch was tagged already. I'd expect to be released *very* shortly (before Christmas), although I don't know an exact date. -- Eitan Adler