From owner-cvs-all Fri Feb 1 12: 3:54 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (leviathan.inethouston.net [66.64.12.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BE5C37B400; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 12:03:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B5919319BD2; Fri, 1 Feb 2002 14:03:55 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2002 14:03:55 -0600 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: Steve Hocking Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/gcc - Imported sources Message-ID: <20020201200355.GC23485@leviathan.inethouston.net> Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." References: <200202011951.g11Jpfd22118@mugwump.hstn.tensor.pgs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200202011951.g11Jpfd22118@mugwump.hstn.tensor.pgs.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.5-RC i386 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Feb 01, 2002 at 01:51:41PM -0600, Steve Hocking wrote: > > The recent import of the new binutils is causing a number of ports (icewm, gs > to name a few) to fail at runtime, shouldn't we really wait until the reasons > for those failures are sorted out before we throw another part of the > toolchain into the mix? Or does gcc-3.10 actually work well with this version > of binutils? > This is -current, things break and we work through them, we don't have to be cautious about breaking things since its a development branch. They will get fixed in time. -- David W. Chapman Jr. dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message