Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 01:44:58 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser@chello.cz> To: markm@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: freebsd-hackers <freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: panic: random.ko Message-ID: <20040421234458.GA37208@isis.wad.cz> In-Reply-To: <200404212254.i3LMshIn039032@grimreaper.grondar.org> References: <20040421170952.GC2088@isis.wad.cz> <200404212254.i3LMshIn039032@grimreaper.grondar.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
# markm@FreeBSD.ORG / 2004-04-21 23:54:43 +0100:
> Roman Neuhauser writes:
> > > unload
> > > load /boot/kernel/kernel
> > > boot
> > >
> > > does it for me.
> >
> > Of course I run unload as the first step. It wrote it unloaded the
> > modules, and the started loading them again booting the new kernel.
>
> Did you type the exact THREE commands as shown above?
Of course, it's been three weeks since I had that problem so I
would be insane to claim I have exact recollection. I might have
been typing
unload
boot /boot/kernel/kernel
over and over again in an attempt to convince myself that I had made
a typo, but I doubt that. Nevertheless, would that make a difference?
It's more likely (= I'm quite sure) I tried both versions more than
once; I *really* wanted to avoid typing "disable-module <foo>"
twelve or so times, which I ended up doing.
Also note that we're talking about CURRENT in case that could mean
a difference.
Hm, I still have the exact same kernel/world on the machine. I'll
try it out in the morning, and will let you know.
--
If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore
your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040421234458.GA37208>