From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 21 16:45:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA63F16A4CF for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:45:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ACEF143D54 for ; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 16:45:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from neuhauser@chello.cz) Received: (qmail 71399 invoked by uid 0); 21 Apr 2004 23:44:59 -0000 Received: from r3al16.mistral.cz (HELO isis.wad.cz) (213.220.229.16) by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 21 Apr 2004 23:44:59 -0000 Received: by isis.wad.cz (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DEAC22FDA01; Thu, 22 Apr 2004 01:44:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 01:44:58 +0200 From: Roman Neuhauser To: markm@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20040421234458.GA37208@isis.wad.cz> Mail-Followup-To: markm@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers References: <20040421170952.GC2088@isis.wad.cz> <200404212254.i3LMshIn039032@grimreaper.grondar.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200404212254.i3LMshIn039032@grimreaper.grondar.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-hackers Subject: Re: panic: random.ko X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 23:45:02 -0000 # markm@FreeBSD.ORG / 2004-04-21 23:54:43 +0100: > Roman Neuhauser writes: > > > unload > > > load /boot/kernel/kernel > > > boot > > > > > > does it for me. > > > > Of course I run unload as the first step. It wrote it unloaded the > > modules, and the started loading them again booting the new kernel. > > Did you type the exact THREE commands as shown above? Of course, it's been three weeks since I had that problem so I would be insane to claim I have exact recollection. I might have been typing unload boot /boot/kernel/kernel over and over again in an attempt to convince myself that I had made a typo, but I doubt that. Nevertheless, would that make a difference? It's more likely (= I'm quite sure) I tried both versions more than once; I *really* wanted to avoid typing "disable-module " twelve or so times, which I ended up doing. Also note that we're talking about CURRENT in case that could mean a difference. Hm, I still have the exact same kernel/world on the machine. I'll try it out in the morning, and will let you know. -- If you cc me or remove the list(s) completely I'll most likely ignore your message. see http://www.eyrie.org./~eagle/faqs/questions.html