From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 18 18:49:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E3F716A4CE for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 18:49:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from web40404.mail.yahoo.com (web40404.mail.yahoo.com [66.218.78.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B506F43D2D for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 18:49:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from beantaxi@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20031219024901.70885.qmail@web40404.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.139.244.188] by web40404.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 18:49:01 PST Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 18:49:01 -0800 (PST) From: The Bean To: Kent Stewart , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <200312181751.08034.kstewart@owt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Kernel build failure - on joy.sh? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: beantaxi@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 02:49:03 -0000 --- Kent Stewart wrote: > Joy.sh was retired but the Makefile still refers to it as an afterinstall > option. The joy.sh script was never removed from my /usr/src by cvsup. > > You could grab joy.sh from the attic. The script that I still have, simply > does "kldload joy". Thank you Kent, for your awfully prompt resposne! This confused me at first, but I believe you're saying that either I can go to the attic and get joy.sh . . . OR, I can simply make a one-liner that says 'kldload joy.sh'. If I don't care about joy then I suppose a 0-liner would work too, as long as make finds something. Since I don't know what the attic is, it might be vi time (or perhaps just touch). So this is a make problem, not a config file problem. What's odd is that my attempt to make installkernel worked when I upgraded, but make installkernel KERNCONF=MyGENERIC fails, even though the only differences are options IPFIREWALL, options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE, and options IPDIVERT. Perhaps the different config file cause make to do more work, and that triggered the problem. Interesting. Should the make file be changed so that it doesn't try to install a module that it doesn't build? Or is there a legitimate reason to try it? Thanks again Kent! Chris __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New Yahoo! Photos - easier uploading and sharing. http://photos.yahoo.com/