From owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 19 03:36:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C83016A4CE for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 03:36:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from whitehall.lin-tech.net (whitehall.lin-tech.net [66.118.35.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D54943D41 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 03:36:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bob@buckhorn.net) Received: from [209.169.67.4] (lfkn-adsl-209-169-67-4.txucom.net [209.169.67.4]) by whitehall.lin-tech.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBAA7FDB9; Sat, 18 Sep 2004 22:36:17 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <414CFE86.9050406@buckhorn.net> Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2004 22:35:34 -0500 From: Bob Martin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8a3) Gecko/20040918 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: timh@tjhawkins.com References: <010801c49dee$72cc5eb0$6401a8c0@yourw92p4bhlzg> <1095546154.671.6.camel@elemental.DashEvil> <010e01c49df0$a5b79400$6401a8c0@yourw92p4bhlzg> In-Reply-To: <010e01c49df0$a5b79400$6401a8c0@yourw92p4bhlzg> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd and fprot cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please explain. X-BeenThere: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD Evangelism List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 03:36:11 -0000 In that case, you should 1) Only post to one list at a time. FreeBSD lists rarely overlap. 2) Make sure the question is germain to the list. Advocacy is not the right list. Bob Martin timh@tjhawkins.com wrote: > Your taking it the wrong way, I was simply asking a question to the > developers to confirm this. > > I have standardized on FreeBSD. > > I apologized if I made it seem like I was trolling, not my intention. > > If a business were to standardize on FreeBSD, they would love to know if the > multithreading issues would be fixed completely correctly not just > 'work-arounds'. > > > sorry and thanks > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Chris Laverdure" > To: > Cc: ; ; > > Sent: Saturday, September 18, 2004 5:22 PM > Subject: Re: Please explain. > > > >>On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 02:14, timh@tjhawkins.com wrote: >> >>>Ask the FreeBSD developers, any of them with honesty should tell you or >>>proof me false. I dare you to proof this false, I would be so happy if > > you > >>>did. Just because I'm using MS Mailer does not reflect whom I am. I have >>>only 1 MS workstation with 9 others unix. >>> >>>I expected a mature response from most of you, calling names is NOT the > > way > >>>to resolve problems. I just want an answer to see if this is true. >>> >>>**Is it true**? This is what I've noticed myself and many high-scale >>>developers. >>> >>>Thank you >> >>1) The burden of proof is on the person making the allegations. >> >>2) Calling a troll on being a troll is mature. >> >>3) If you believe it to be true, then don't use FreeBSD. Nobody is tying >>your hands here. You believe DragonFlyBSD to be superior? Then use it. >> >>Maybe I just don't see the big deal here, but the developers owe you >>nothing. >> >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-advocacy > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-advocacy-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"