From owner-freebsd-small Sat Jan 29 20:41: 2 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-small@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 758) id 7F69214DA4; Sat, 29 Jan 2000 20:41:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70FA11CD6DB; Sat, 29 Jan 2000 20:41:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@hub.freebsd.org) Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2000 20:41:01 -0800 (PST) From: Kris Kennaway To: Greg Lehey Cc: Andrzej Bialecki , Michael Larsen , Roger Hardiman , small@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: PicoBSD changes for 4.0-current In-Reply-To: <20000130132119.A55643@freebie.lemis.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-small@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 30 Jan 2000, Greg Lehey wrote: > Given the recent discussion about maintainers in general, I think we > should only have maintainers for those products where one person does > the bulk (> 75%) of the work. I don't think PicoBSD fits into this > category, so I'd suggest that we don't have a maintainer. How about MAINTAINER = freebsd-small, then, to indicate that changes should be passed by this list? Kris To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-small" in the body of the message