From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 15 15:07:39 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CB0D1065673; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:07:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F208FC08; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:07:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id pAFF7dYG077672; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:07:39 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id pAFF7ds3077671; Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:07:39 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 16:07:35 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Andriy Gapon Message-ID: <20111115150735.GA96251@azathoth.lan> References: <4EC2786E.5060907@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EC2786E.5060907@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: FreeBSD Ports , Chris Rees , Doug Barton Subject: Re: [removed ports] sysutils/cpuburn X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2011 15:07:39 -0000 --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 04:34:22PM +0200, Andriy Gapon wrote: >=20 > Does anyone know good any alternative(s) for cpuburn? > If not, then I would like to request that this port be restored. > I am prepared to be designated as its maintainer and to host its distfile= (via my > FreeBSD account). >=20 > Maintaining the port should be rather easy as it can not have any securit= y issues > by definition and at the moment there is no active upstream, so no code c= hanges > are expected. >=20 > P.S. Sorry that I've missed its deprecation. I haven't noticed the activ= ity until > I needed to use it at yet another system. >=20 I often use sysutils/stress don't know if that fits your needs? regards, Bapt --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk7CgDcACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwLTQCeI+et88AyF3xhSN3RLO0+2Jr8 GGYAmwc7iQbZvuqGvifvLO/6YRi5Gxvr =nHSG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --oyUTqETQ0mS9luUI--